AI audits and monitors. Your team decides what ships.
Your employees build internal tools with AI. BWorlds audits each one, hands the builder the fix, watches it in production, and shows you which apps are validated. No engineer to hire, no queue at IT.
Read-only audit. Nothing changes in an app unless a person applies it. The demo is thirty minutes with the BWorlds team, on one app your people built.
Built with the tools your teams already use. Audited and watched by BWorlds.
Lovable
Bolt
Replit
v0
Base44
Claude Code
Built outside IT
Six ways an employee’s app becomes your problem.
Each one has a mechanism behind it. Not a policy, not a ban.
What happens todayWhat BWorlds does
Nobody knows how many apps are running, or which ones hold customer data.
Inventory. Every app your people import lands in one list, with its owner, its quality level and what is open.
An app built in a week has the client database readable without a login.
Audit. Security, data, reliability, costs and code quality reviewed on every app before it is validated.
The person who built it is not an engineer and cannot act on a security report.
Guided fix. Each finding comes in plain language with a BWorlds fix to paste into their AI tool.
IT would have to review each app by hand, so it says no to all of them.
Self-serve. The builder audits and fixes their own app. IT reads the result instead of doing the work.
The app breaks on a Sunday and the team hears about it from a supplier.
Watch. Uptime, errors and user sessions monitored around the clock, tied to the change that caused them.
Six months in, the app has quietly become business-critical and nobody has looked at it since.
Recheck. The audit runs again as the app changes, so a quality level is never a snapshot.
45% of AI-generated code contains vulnerabilities. (AlterSquare, 2025)
What you actually get
Keep the speed. Lose the blind spot.
BWorlds sits above the AI tools your people build with. It does not build apps and it does not replace IT. Every app gets the review a CTO would run, the builder gets the fix, and you get the list.
See every app your people built
One list: each app, who owns it, its quality level, what is open.
Let builders fix their own apps
Plain-language findings with a BWorlds fix for their AI tool.
Decide what ships
BWorlds proposes. A person applies and publishes. BWorlds verifies it landed.
Hear about it before a supplier does
Uptime, errors and sessions watched around the clock, alerts by email or Slack.
What gets checked
The review a CTO would run, on every app.
Seven areas, audited before an app is validated and again as it changes. What passed and what is still open sits on the app’s card, readable by someone who is not technical.
No keys or secrets exposed in the browser Security
One supplier cannot read another supplier’s orders Data integrity
Personal data mapped, tracking waits for consent Compliance
Uptime and errors monitored around the clock Reliability
Rate limits on public endpoints Open
Backups tested by restoring them Open
Built from the app’s own results, open items included. The quality level moves as they close.
In production
When an app runs the business, someone has to stand behind it.
The Good Fab makes sustainable corporate gifts and branded merchandise in Nantes. A co-founder who is not a developer built its production tracking app with Lovable, to get orders out of email threads. The team and the suppliers now run production on it every day.
Uptime, errors and user sessions watched around the clock by BWorlds
Problems surface before the team or a supplier runs into them
Read-only audit and guided fixes. The co-founder applies and publishes
Five daily users, twenty more planned as suppliers come onboard
A feature asked for in the morning is live the same day, still watched
A non-developer keeps shipping at the pace of the requests. The app the business runs on stays watched while it does.
The demo is run by the BWorlds team.
Thirty minutes. Bring one app your people built. We run the audit on it together, and you see what the list would look like for your company.
BWorlds SAS, Nantes. The team spent ten years running engineering, security and compliance for a US SaaS with Fortune 500 clients, after a start in cyberdefense, and builds its audit agents in-house.
Every audit runs on playbooks built from how experienced engineering teams work: separating data between users, controlling AI and cloud spend, reviewing code before it ships. The app built in sales gets the same review as the one built in finance.
BWorlds
Validate an App Before the Team Depends on It
Emmanuel Marboeuf
Co-founder of BWorlds. 10 years as a CTO, cyberdefense background.
The full review before an app goes company-wide: we map it quietly, ask what can never break, then dig where the business is exposed. A ranked fix list the builder can work through, not a report for IT to file.
BWorlds
See What a Stranger Can See
Emmanuel Marboeuf
Co-founder of BWorlds. 10 years as a CTO, cyberdefense background.
A read-only pass over everything an internal app shows the internet: exposed keys, customer data readable without login, doors locked only in the browser. Every claim verified, nothing touched.
BWorlds
Keep One User Out of Another’s Data
Emmanuel Marboeuf
Co-founder of BWorlds. 10 years as a CTO, cyberdefense background.
Verifies the walls inside the app: which employee, client or supplier can read, change or delete which records, tested from the outside and traced in the code. The gap we find most often in AI-built apps.
BWorlds
Catch What a Publish Breaks
Dorian Ouvrard
Co-founder of BWorlds. AI engineer and tech lead.
Errors, live user sessions, uptime and the latest changes, read together. When a publish quietly breaks sign-in, the builder hears it in minutes with the exact change that caused it, before a colleague does.
BWorlds
Never Explain a Five-Figure Bill
Emmanuel Marboeuf
Co-founder of BWorlds. 10 years as a CTO, cyberdefense background.
Hunts down every way an internal app can spend company money without asking: AI keys visible in the code, paid features with no caps, uploads with no limits. Each leak closed and verified shut.
BWorlds
Stay Right with Privacy Law
Emmanuel Marboeuf
Co-founder of BWorlds. 10 years as a CTO, cyberdefense background.
What personal data the app collects, on employees, clients or suppliers, where it goes, and whether tracking waits for consent. Reviewed before your DPO, a client or a regulator asks the question.
BWorlds
Keep Shipping Without Breaking Things
Dorian Ouvrard
Co-founder of BWorlds. AI engineer and tech lead.
A structure review of what the AI built: components doing too many jobs, the same logic written three ways, risky dependencies. So next month’s small change does not topple the last ten.
BWorlds
Survive the Move From Five Users to Fifty
Dorian Ouvrard
Co-founder of BWorlds. AI engineer and tech lead.
Spots what works for one team and collapses when the whole company logs in: pages that load entire tables, lists that query row by row. Fixed in impact order, before adoption turns into the first outage.
What it replaces
Governance you would otherwise piece together.
What a company normally assembles to keep ten employee-built apps safe. For the apps it knows about.
What you needPieced togetherWith BWorlds
Uptime monitoring$35 to $65 / moIncluded
Error tracking$26 to $80 / moIncluded
Session replay$25 to $176 / moIncluded
Code security scanning$250 to $300 / mo for ten buildersIncluded
An audit of each app as it changesA senior contractor one day a week, $2,300 to $2,900 / moIncluded
Someone on call when an app breaksAn on-call retainer, $500 to $1,500 / moIncluded
What it comes toAbout $4,000 / mo on average, tools and peoplePro from $180 / mo. Enterprise terms custom.
Tool ranges are public list prices as of September 2026, from the team tier to a mid plan, for ten apps and ten builders. The contractor line uses the 2026 Malt barometer for experienced developers, and the on-call line is a typical retainer. The total is the midpoint of every range. See the plans
See what your people have built. Then decide what ships.
Thirty minutes with the BWorlds team. Bring one app, we audit it together, and you leave with the list.
A company where employees build internal tools with Lovable, Bolt, Claude or another AI tool, and where the IT team has no time to review each one. Small enough that hiring an engineer for this makes no sense, large enough that someone is accountable for the apps. Very large companies with on-premise requirements are not the fit today.
BWorlds does not replace either. Your platform governs the apps built inside it. BWorlds covers the ones built outside, with Lovable, Bolt or Claude, that your current tools cannot see.
No. The builder audits and fixes their own app, self-serve. IT reads the list: which apps exist, who owns them, what is open. Nobody in IT applies a fix or reviews an app by hand.
Every finding comes in plain language with a BWorlds fix: the exact instructions to paste into the AI tool they built with. They apply it, publish, and BWorlds rechecks the app to confirm it worked. No engineer needed.
No. The audit is read-only, and nothing changes unless a person applies it. Agent-applied changes are not the default and are never made without explicit approval. Your code stays in your repositories.
BWorlds reads the code of the apps you authorize and their commits. Code is analyzed under OpenAI’s enterprise terms and is not used to train models. Hosting is in the United States, with a DPA and Standard Contractual Clauses available. The full detail is on the security page.
Today BWorlds runs as SaaS and does not offer a sovereign or on-premise deployment. EU data location is on the roadmap. If one of these is a hard requirement, say so at the demo and we tell you where we stand.
Neither. A one-off audit covers one moment; BWorlds keeps checking as the app changes and while people use it. It is not a pentest either: it catches the real traps first, exposed keys, an open database, broken access between users, no monitoring, and says exactly what was checked.
They join the workspace. The findings are their job spec, the rechecks their acceptance test, and the app’s history their context. Nothing you set up is lost, and you keep the same view.
BWorlds prices by credits, not by app or by person, on the same plans as everyone: Pro from $180 a month for the team, Enterprise terms for SSO, contract terms, response times and integrations. The right tier is set in the demo.
No. Your people keep building with the tool they choose, and the apps stay yours. BWorlds sits above the tools, not in their place.