See every app your people built
One list: each app, who owns it, its quality level, what is open.
Your employees build internal tools with AI. BWorlds audits each one, hands the builder the fix, watches it in production, and shows you which apps are validated. No engineer to hire, no queue at IT.
Read-only audit. Nothing changes in an app unless a person applies it. The demo is thirty minutes with the BWorlds team, on one app your people built.
Built with the tools your teams already use.
Audited and watched by BWorlds.
Built outside IT
Each one has a mechanism behind it. Not a policy, not a ban.
Nobody knows how many apps are running, or which ones hold customer data.
Inventory. Every app your people import lands in one list, with its owner, its quality level and what is open.
An app built in a week has the client database readable without a login.
Audit. Security, data, reliability, costs and code quality reviewed on every app before it is validated.
The person who built it is not an engineer and cannot act on a security report.
Guided fix. Each finding comes in plain language with a BWorlds fix to paste into their AI tool.
IT would have to review each app by hand, so it says no to all of them.
Self-serve. The builder audits and fixes their own app. IT reads the result instead of doing the work.
The app breaks on a Sunday and the team hears about it from a supplier.
Watch. Uptime, errors and user sessions monitored around the clock, tied to the change that caused them.
Six months in, the app has quietly become business-critical and nobody has looked at it since.
Recheck. The audit runs again as the app changes, so a quality level is never a snapshot.
45% of AI-generated code contains vulnerabilities. (AlterSquare, 2025)
What you actually get
BWorlds sits above the AI tools your people build with. It does not build apps and it does not replace IT. Every app gets the review a CTO would run, the builder gets the fix, and you get the list.
One list: each app, who owns it, its quality level, what is open.
Plain-language findings with a BWorlds fix for their AI tool.
BWorlds proposes. A person applies and publishes. BWorlds verifies it landed.
Uptime, errors and sessions watched around the clock, alerts by email or Slack.
What gets checked
Seven areas, audited before an app is validated and again as it changes. What passed and what is still open sits on the app’s card, readable by someone who is not technical.
supplier-portal
Owner: Karim B. · Audited by BWorlds
Built from the app’s own results, open items included. The quality level moves as they close.
In production
Pierre Tucoulat, co-founder of The Good Fab, is not a developer. He built the company’s production tracking app with Lovable to get orders out of email threads. The team and the suppliers now use it every day, and it runs under BWorlds monitoring.
Read the story“I’m stunned by how fast I can build.”
Thirty minutes. Bring one app your people built. We run the audit on it together, and you see what the list would look like for your company.
BWorlds SAS, Nantes. The team spent ten years running engineering, security and compliance for a US SaaS with Fortune 500 clients, after a start in cyberdefense, and builds its audit agents in-house.
For procurement and IT
In-progress items are marked as such, so the buying conversation stays on what exists today.
Not offered: sovereign or on-premise deployment, and white-label. BWorlds runs as SaaS. If one of these is a hard requirement, say so at the demo.
Every audit runs on playbooks built from how experienced engineering teams work: separating data between users, controlling AI and cloud spend, reviewing code before it ships. The app built in sales gets the same review as the one built in finance.
What it replaces
What a company normally assembles to keep ten employee-built apps safe. For the apps it knows about.
Tool ranges are public list prices as of September 2026, from the team tier to a mid plan, for ten apps and ten builders. The contractor line uses the 2026 Malt barometer for experienced developers, and the on-call line is a typical retainer. The total is the midpoint of every range. See the plans
Thirty minutes with the BWorlds team. Bring one app, we audit it together, and you leave with the list.
A company where employees build internal tools with Lovable, Bolt, Claude or another AI tool, and where the IT team has no time to review each one. Small enough that hiring an engineer for this makes no sense, large enough that someone is accountable for the apps. Very large companies with on-premise requirements are not the fit today.
BWorlds does not replace either. Your platform governs the apps built inside it. BWorlds covers the ones built outside, with Lovable, Bolt or Claude, that your current tools cannot see.
No. The builder audits and fixes their own app, self-serve. IT reads the list: which apps exist, who owns them, what is open. Nobody in IT applies a fix or reviews an app by hand.
Every finding comes in plain language with a BWorlds fix: the exact instructions to paste into the AI tool they built with. They apply it, publish, and BWorlds rechecks the app to confirm it worked. No engineer needed.
No. The audit is read-only, and nothing changes unless a person applies it. Agent-applied changes are not the default and are never made without explicit approval. Your code stays in your repositories.
BWorlds reads the code of the apps you authorize and their commits. Code is analyzed under OpenAI’s enterprise terms and is not used to train models. Hosting is in the United States, with a DPA and Standard Contractual Clauses available. The full detail is on the security page.
Today BWorlds runs as SaaS and does not offer a sovereign or on-premise deployment. EU data location is on the roadmap. If one of these is a hard requirement, say so at the demo and we tell you where we stand.
Neither. A one-off audit covers one moment; BWorlds keeps checking as the app changes and while people use it. It is not a pentest either: it catches the real traps first, exposed keys, an open database, broken access between users, no monitoring, and says exactly what was checked.
They join the workspace. The findings are their job spec, the rechecks their acceptance test, and the app’s history their context. Nothing you set up is lost, and you keep the same view.
BWorlds prices by credits, not by app or by person, on the same plans as everyone: Pro from $180 a month for the team, Enterprise terms for SSO, contract terms, response times and integrations. The right tier is set in the demo.
No. Your people keep building with the tool they choose, and the apps stay yours. BWorlds sits above the tools, not in their place.
Founding team with paying customers? For startups. Building apps for clients? For agencies. Building on your own? Builders.